03-08-2025, 09:33 PM
Maybe you mean 2325 on the WOT? +2500 would really be spinning those engines.
The 52 has very long shafts and tend to get shaft whip in certain conditions and certain rpm ranges. For the most part I get almost no vibrations once I get over 1600. Below that and the hull gets inefficient causing the engines to work hard and put a load on the shafts. Thats pretty much the only time I get shaft whip/vibrations.
I am running 32X38 with the lightest trim strips on the props. WOT is 2320 at near full fuel load. I cruise around 1800 and at half fuel I usually see about 27 mph @48 GPH ( about .56 MPG). I want to say at 1900 I am around 29 MPH and about .52 MPG. Backing down to 1700 gets me to about .58-.6 MPG but the boat starts to feel heavy. I run in fresh water so I suspect I would pick up performance in salt water.
I very much like that the engine loading/ fuel burn numbers are below what Cat recommends until about 2000 and above.
Hope this helps.
The 52 has very long shafts and tend to get shaft whip in certain conditions and certain rpm ranges. For the most part I get almost no vibrations once I get over 1600. Below that and the hull gets inefficient causing the engines to work hard and put a load on the shafts. Thats pretty much the only time I get shaft whip/vibrations.
I am running 32X38 with the lightest trim strips on the props. WOT is 2320 at near full fuel load. I cruise around 1800 and at half fuel I usually see about 27 mph @48 GPH ( about .56 MPG). I want to say at 1900 I am around 29 MPH and about .52 MPG. Backing down to 1700 gets me to about .58-.6 MPG but the boat starts to feel heavy. I run in fresh water so I suspect I would pick up performance in salt water.
I very much like that the engine loading/ fuel burn numbers are below what Cat recommends until about 2000 and above.
Hope this helps.


![[-]](https://www.tiaraownersclub.com/forum/images/netpen-pro/collapse.png)